I don’t know whether it’s American culture or simply human nature, but most of us truly despise that lone teacher’s pet in our midst. He is something we’re not. She receives the favors we don’t. He’s fake. She simply does it to receive those authoritarian favors. We beat up the teacher’s pet!
Now that you and I have repented of our baser nature, consider with me why piety is not well embraced even in our churchy worlds. Is it possible that our inner playground children are still running amok, looking for teachers’ pets everywhere … to give them knuckle-sandwiches? Is it possible we view the pious among us as suck-ups to the Great Teacher in that pearly-gated classroom? Or … we might regard the pious as simply robed with Joseph’s coat-of-many-colors-of-luck.
We typically hold the wild alcoholic who came to Jesus late in life in high regard, for her “good testimony.” We give faint, lip service to the man who plugged it out day after day, year after year, for Jesus, faithfully. Or we may even hold these soft-spoken saints in the highest regard, sending them cards, holding dinners in their honor. But we hold them at arm’s length.
This is truly unfortunate, as it perhaps reveals an underlying attitude of disbelief. The so-called pious are either sucking-up to God, or they are too holy to even be around. Nonetheless, piety is for them. As for me, I’m just hoping to make heaven. The disbelief comes in refusing to accept, perhaps even subconsciously, that piety is for me … is for you.
Instead of thinking of piety in terms of Stephen King’s version of the holy (possessing special powers to ward off evil beasts), it is better to conceive of piety as simply the practice of consistent deliberateness regarding God and my fellow man.
In other words, instead of viewing that gray-haired-and-bent-over Sunday School teacher has possessing lucky-rabbit’s foot powers, think of her as simply practicing … rather faithfully … to deliberately study and prepare for her lesson.
Besides, if the rabbit’s foot is so lucky, why did it not prevent the rabbit from losing his foot?
Seriously, though, we tend to think of those who succeed in our culture as having done so on the basis of special treatment or on the basis of luck stalking and seducing talent. Perhaps we should remember that talent without deliberate hard work only renders an interesting person to dialogue with in the unemployment line. Perhaps we should also remember that special favors don’t necessarily produce success. Without character training and development, special favors milked from Daddy Warbucks only produces spilt milk.
In the same vein, the pious are not the lucky-of-God; nor are they God’s suck-ups. The fire of his pet-act of refining character will not allow suck-ups to hang around his desk too long. The truly pious among us are simply the ones who take their faith serious enough to act with certain deliberateness and consistency in their everyday lives. And those everyday lives are deliberately and consistently lived for the love of God and of neighbor … not for the love of self-image (as in the archetype of the teacher’s pet) … and certainly not lived as the love-child of luck and talent. The pious are simply deliberate and consistent in the active practice of their faith.
Thus, the question is not “why them?” The question is isn’t even ”why not me?” The question is “why should I not?” which alludes to my willingness or unwillingness to practice consistency and deliberateness in all areas of my faith. Such is a lifestyle of worship to which God has called every believer.

